After watching the two-part video on the history and workings of the U.S. Supreme Court, I believe that I gained a deeper understanding of the Court’s role in American democracy. Although I had a general idea of the Court’s function, the video provided a comprehensive look at its origins, evolution throughout the years, and the principles that guide its decision-making.
I learned a lot about the inner workings of the Supreme Court, especially the process by which cases are selected for review. Before watching the video, I wasn’t fully aware of how many cases the Court receives each year and how few it actually agrees to hear. (Ex: Utah Fed. Land Control)
An important concept that most Americans don’t grasp is the immense power the Supreme Court holds in interpreting the Constitution and shaping national policy. The Court doesn’t just settle legal disputes but also defines the scope of rights and freedoms for Americans. This power has huge implications, as decisions made by the Court can have lasting effects on law, society, and even the direction of the country.
The most surprising thing to learn is the role of public opinion in influencing the Court’s decisions, despite the Court being designed as an independent body. The video mentioned that even though justices are not elected, they are still influenced by the political climate and public sentiment.
Even if the Court does not make decisions based on the public opinion of the American people, it’s clear that its legitimacy relies on public trust, which oftentimes shift with landmark rulings. This makes me think about how the balance of power between branches of government plays out and how the Court has to navigate this dynamic while staying true to the Constitution.
The Supreme Court is beyond an institution that interprets laws, it plays a significant role in shaping societal values and political discourse. I now have a greater appreciation for the complexity of its decisions and the influence those decisions have, both legally and culturally. The Court is not just a referee of law but a key player in the ongoing evolution of American democracy.